The C4 Institute is not a church; it is a weather station. We forecast the storm.
Data released by major agencies (NASA, ESA, JAXA) or published in peer-reviewed journals (JBIS, ApJ, Nature) that explicitly matches the C4 Model prediction.
Preliminary telemetry, raw spectra, or observational data that supports the C4 Model but lacks formal institutional validation. The data fits, but the paper isn't stamped yet.
Future events that have not yet occurred. This is where the tension lives. These predictions will be tested during the Jupiter encounter (March-May 2026) and beyond.
We do not "fail"; we filter. We successfully identified noise and removed it from the dataset. This demonstrates the C4 Methodology's ability to separate signal from noise.
The C4 Institute operates as a weather station, not a church. We make falsifiable predictions based on the Hybrid Engine Model, then track how Nature responds.
Unlike conspiracy theorists who cherry-pick data, we:
"The Architect does not argue with the bricklayer. He simply points to the blueprint."
Two critical events will definitively test the machine hypothesis. These are not gradual trends—they are binary switches.
Prediction: OH production drops from 40 kg/s → 0 kg/s in <24 hours
Timeline: March 2026 (14±3 days post-maneuver)
Significance: Rocks fade gradually (1/r²). Engines cut abruptly.
Prediction: Sharp 90° inclination shift out of ecliptic plane
Timeline: May 2026+ (post-Jupiter)
Significance: Gravity assists are predictable. Course corrections are deliberate.